Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

net monitoring isnt that bad if you are careful...

 

I live in a campus dorm at the moment and i have a 2 gb bandwidth cap per day, which by itself isnt that bad as i usually never exceed it (although i can get it to be 1.99 gb per day....) The only bad part is that if i want to dl a game/movie that is over 2 gb, then i have to do it over several days which is a pain, especially when new stuff comes out...

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

NONE of you should be complaining until youve dealt with DSL =[

what's wrong with it?

 

It's slow and it drops sometimes, well at least my DSL service did. It was completely unreliable.

 

250gb bandwidth caps are reasonable. I don't think anyone could hit that limit really unless they're really trying to but hell I have a 250mb cap per day so I rather have Comcast's thing than mine.

Posted

Keep in mind its not how much you download its how much you download/upload its total traffic per month. So lets says you download 100 gb of data and seed to a 1:1 ratio thats 200 gb right there.

Yes im on comcast yes this sux

Posted
NONE of you should be complaining until youve dealt with DSL =[

 

Have you checked the ISP I have to use in my last post, much worse than DSL or Cable not to mention you are throttled between 4PM - 12PM EST at a whopping 100 kb/s and on average between those time you get to download files or browse web pages at a whole 15 - 30Kb/s, speed depends on how congested the network is and may vary.

Posted
Keep in mind its not how much you download its how much you download/upload its total traffic per month. So lets says you download 100 gb of data and seed to a 1:1 ratio thats 200 gb right there.

Yes im on comcast yes this sux

there won't be a ratio of 1:1 well unless you actually seed torrents or something.

Posted

Keep in mind its not how much you download its how much you download/upload its total traffic per month. So lets says you download 100 gb of data and seed to a 1:1 ratio thats 200 gb right there.

Yes im on comcast yes this sux

there won't be a ratio of 1:1 well unless you actually seed torrents or something.

some of us actually seed back what we download, I know it's a hard concept to grasp. I upload double what I download easily, I keep a 2:1 or better ratio on the soup and blackcats at all times.

If Time Warner were to do this I'd be in major trouble quickly. not to mention youtube, streaming movies, xbox live traffic. 250gb isn't a lot in these times.

Posted

the point I'm making is the is enough for people who are not realy downlading illegally. cuts down piracy a little and I can live with 250 gigs a month do you even realize how much that is and how bad it is to be using that much monthly?

Posted
...do you even realize how much that is and how bad it is to be using that much monthly?

 

Bad for whom?

 

My ISP throttles at certain times of the day when you exceed a specified amount of GB. Just looking at last month's logs I tranferred 849 gigs, although this month it was only 384. On average it would be around 400-500. Considering the size of games, HD movies, flac, streaming video etc then 250GB may not be nearly enough for your average p*rate.

Posted

Well we're Americans and we demand bigger, larger, badder, and other awesome adjectives.

 

These limits better go up in the future. Remember how much you used to download a few years ago? That's tiny to how much you download now. The larger our HDDs get and the more we move over to digital distribution this is going to really be a thorn in the side.

Posted

Its not that the limit might go up, its that putting a limit on will mean that they are going to start lowering it and charging you exorbitant fees if you go over...250 is just a start...if there are no large complaints, then slowly it will be lowered...eventually down to what the average web surfing soccer mom uses a month, so that any downloading will cause you to break the cap and cause you to have to pay large fees...

Posted
Its not that the limit might go up, its that putting a limit on will mean that they are going to start lowering it and charging you exorbitant fees if you go over...250 is just a start...if there are no large complaints, then slowly it will be lowered...eventually down to what the average web surfing soccer mom uses a month, so that any downloading will cause you to break the cap and cause you to have to pay large fees...

 

Then that's when Comcast looses all their customers, or we all actually get "active" and do something about it.

Posted

Its not that the limit might go up, its that putting a limit on will mean that they are going to start lowering it and charging you exorbitant fees if you go over...250 is just a start...if there are no large complaints, then slowly it will be lowered...eventually down to what the average web surfing soccer mom uses a month, so that any downloading will cause you to break the cap and cause you to have to pay large fees...

 

Then that's when Comcast looses all their customers, or we all actually get "active" and do something about it.

Loses customers to where? Most places only have one cable company and one DSL company. It's only a matter of time till other companies start their bandwidth caps.

Posted

Its not that the limit might go up, its that putting a limit on will mean that they are going to start lowering it and charging you exorbitant fees if you go over...250 is just a start...if there are no large complaints, then slowly it will be lowered...eventually down to what the average web surfing soccer mom uses a month, so that any downloading will cause you to break the cap and cause you to have to pay large fees...

 

Then that's when Comcast looses all their customers, or we all actually get "active" and do something about it.

Loses customers to where? Most places only have one cable company and one DSL company. It's only a matter of time till other companies start their bandwidth caps.

 

Loose it's customers period! You think Comcast will keep up their limit if every internet user out there agrees to not pay their bill/cancel until change occurs?

 

While it is hope full, it wouldn't be a impossibility.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...