fumanchu Posted April 6, 2008 Posted April 6, 2008 i never liked this film,camera was annoying and the whole film was a waste of a couple of hours.
Smilee Posted April 7, 2008 Posted April 7, 2008 I enjoyed it, and the camera work as well. It manifested the perspective that's more relative to the viewer.
NeuronMaster Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 OH MANI HATED IT BECAUSE IT SUCKED BECAUSE MY BEST FRIEND SAID IT SUCKED EVEN THOUGH I SAW IT AND DID NOT THINK IT SUCKED. flock off, tools. It was awesome because form matches function: By seeing the disaster happen through the eyes of a doofus, it makes the entire situation plausible.
solidius23 Posted April 8, 2008 Posted April 8, 2008 ive enjoyed the flick everytime i have seen it. it was a nice love story with some make ya think monster crap happening on the side. the cam work was one of the things i loved about it. cant wait for the sequal or prequal or what ever they are gonna do with the second one.i for one would be pleased with them doing a normal movie telling what happened, how it got here ,and the aftermath.
Salorskin Posted April 10, 2008 Posted April 10, 2008 Pointless dialogue? I didn't realize such a thing even existed... I'm with Wizard on this one.
Wizard Posted April 11, 2008 Posted April 11, 2008 ......King Kong was GreatKing Kong was the biggest let down in the last 5 years. Too much emphisis on being CGI, it's slow build up and medicore dailogue is also another reason why it was just felt so average. It got a decent acting from SOME of the actors, but it leaves more to be desired for. I do praise it's cinematography though, it was top notch.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now