Mr.X Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 (edited) I don't agree, because we're naturally made to learn & speak a language.Many animals communicate, does that mean they are destined for there fate as well?<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes & No : when you speak or establish a contact with a person, you make your story, which directs your fate. Btw, your fate's already directed if you have an incurable genetic disease for example. Edited December 30, 2004 by Mr.X
Agozer Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 I still say it's 42.Why won't they listen to us, I wonder...
Mr.X Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 (edited) I still say it's 42.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why won't they listen to us, I wonder...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Why 42 ? If it's a biblic number, it should be 7, like the max number of electronic layers of atoms. Edited December 30, 2004 by Mr.X
Wizard Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 I still say it's 42.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why won't they listen to us, I wonder...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Why 42 ? If it's a biblic number, it should be 7, like the max number of electronic layers of atoms.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>You fail at books.
Gryph Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 I still say it's 42.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why won't they listen to us, I wonder...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Why 42 ? If it's a biblic number, it should be 7, like the max number of electronic layers of atoms.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy."
Mr.X Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 I still say it's 42.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why won't they listen to us, I wonder...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Why 42 ? If it's a biblic number, it should be 7, like the max number of electronic layers of atoms.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy."<{POST_SNAPBACK}> If it's an encyclopedia touching on scientific subjects & offering rational proves, that's all right ! Btw, if it's a kind of encyclopedia with false answers written by men w/out scruples to benefit from it, no...
Gryph Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 I still say it's 42.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why won't they listen to us, I wonder...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Why 42 ? If it's a biblic number, it should be 7, like the max number of electronic layers of atoms.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy."<{POST_SNAPBACK}> If it's an encyclopedia touching on scientific subjects & offering rational proves, that's all right ! Btw, if it's a kind of encyclopedia with false answers written by men w/out scruples to benefit from it, no...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's a humor book.
Junior Chillage Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 That brings us to another aspect... Maybe humor is the purpose of life Though, in that case many would've lost track of purpose
Cominus Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 I still say it's 42.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Why won't they listen to us, I wonder...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Why 42 ? If it's a biblic number, it should be 7, like the max number of electronic layers of atoms.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy."<{POST_SNAPBACK}> If it's an encyclopedia touching on scientific subjects & offering rational proves, that's all right ! Btw, if it's a kind of encyclopedia with false answers written by men w/out scruples to benefit from it, no...<{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's a humor book.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> I got that book off of shareaza.
Elazul Yagami Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 the purpose of life is that there IS NO PURPOSE I don't agree, because we're naturally made to learn & speak a language. Brain's area called Broca's area's involved in the construction of higher parts of the syntactic tree in speech production.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> that's because we've programmed that part of the brain for that function, in another way (if man hadn't invented language) it could've been used for telepathy or something.
Mr.X Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 the purpose of life is that there IS NO PURPOSE I don't agree, because we're naturally made to learn & speak a language. Brain's area called Broca's area's involved in the construction of higher parts of the syntactic tree in speech production.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> that's because we've programmed that part of the brain for that function, in another way (if man hadn't invented language) it could've been used for telepathy or something.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think that function 's totally natural, because even chimpanzees 've it. But those monkeys can't articulate like humans.Btw, telepathic abilities 're impossible ; nobody, nothing can abolish distancies.
Elazul Yagami Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 yes, that part of the brain is communication, NOT a specific kind like language and speech.it's molded into what you want it to be molded into. as for telepathy being impossible , you'r quite wrong.
Mr.X Posted December 31, 2004 Posted December 31, 2004 as for telepathy being impossible , you'r quite wrong.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> There's no rational prove. So, telepathic abilities come from science fiction.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now