Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hold on a second!!! People are confused so lets reiterate what's going down. The assault weapons ban law was passed 10 years ago, circa 1994. It wasn't the bill that advocates had hoped it would be but they were satisfied. In any case, every once in the while the law must be renewed. As of now.....it's not being renewed!!! Even though in a 2000 speech, George W. said he would renew it. So there you have it. Come Monday in the United States, AK-47's, Tech-9's, Uzi's, and the hot new coveted AR-15 rifle (Armalite's phones are ringing off the hook for this one) will be street legal. Since I think it's to late now.....bring it on!!!

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Something tells me it won't be long before this, or something similar, is re-instated. Or someone is going to be lynched (or shot with a Tech9).

Posted
W00T! I can kill people with style now!

Style? You have to use knifes if you want to kill with style. :naughty:

Or a newspaper... KGB style!

KGB is like, just removing them from existance without doing anything. Just poke them and they vanish.

Posted
Ah, so KGB are magicians.

You could say that. :lol:

 

At night they would abduct trouble makers and no one knew where they were taken.

Posted (edited)

No civilian should be allowed to own ANY firearm for any means other than hunting. That "Right to bear arms" is BS, and your laws are quite retarded in the US......no wonder crimes involving firearms are so high in the US. Crazy Americans.

 

P.S. I was in the army, and I'll reiterate, NO CIVILIAN SHOULD OWN FIREARMS

Edited by IJTF_Cinder
Posted (edited)

everyone knows that amendment was created in revolutionary times before the war of 1812 to finish off any brits that were left after the revolutionary war :lol:

 

not even rednecks are stupid enough to try and recite the 2nd amendment. Btw, aren't you canadian?

Edited by Weirdanzeige
Posted

This is the Second Amendment:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

 

That was definitely for the militias which basically made up the army back then.

Posted
This is the Second Amendment:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

 

That was definitely for the militias which basically made up the army back then.

So really the second ammendement could just be considered the "right to have an army"?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...