random guy Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 (edited) Bullshit. I have no love for my army, but there's no way in hell they'd strip prisoners naked and put them in sexual poses then take photographs of them. There's no way in the world they would put a bag over someone's head for over 72 hours. And like you should understand by now, I don't hate America,I don't hate Americans (I don't hate any of you guys), I hate the American government and army, i hate American imperialism and the fact that the government is trying to raise an empire, and I hate this war.PS If you think the things I say about bush and his government is bad, you should hear what I say about our prime minister and his cronies! Edited May 18, 2004 by random guy
Inky Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 (edited) but there's no way in hell they'd strip prisoners naked and put them in sexual poses then take photographs of themwhy not? are they perfect? an army is made up of individuls, and a good pecentage of the people the military attracts are the testosterone fueled bullies, who would do such things. if the austrailian army is free of opertunistic bullies. good for you guys! but I don't buy it. and the USA isn't trying to raise an empire. if that were the case it would make much more sense to take bordering countries and grow outwards a US state halfway across the world in a god forsaken desert doesn't make sense. and would never be safe.Is the US trying to secure it's influance in the middle east? Of course it is. edit in: i've got a plane to catch, i'll talk to you guys when i get to AZ. hopefully by then all this political stuff is out of your systems @ random: no hard feelings mate. just lively debate. Edited May 18, 2004 by garageink
Agozer Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 Sarin gas keeps my sinuses clear. Anyway, I wish you two would at least argue about the topic at hand here. Well, at least the Americans found something, instead of whole lot of nothing like before.
random guy Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 (edited) but there's no way in hell they'd strip prisoners naked and put them in sexual poses then take photographs of themwhy not? are they perfect? an army is made up of individuls, and a good pecentage of the people the military attracts are the testosterone fueled bullies, who would do such things. if the austrailian army is free of opertunistic bullies. good for you guys! but I don't buy it. and the USA isn't trying to raise an empire. if that were the case it would make much more sense to take bordering countries and grow outwards a US state halfway across the world in a god forsaken desert doesn't make sense. and would never be safe.Is the US trying to secure it's influance in the middle east? Of course it is. edit in: i've got a plane to catch, i'll talk to you guys when i get to AZ. hopefully by then all this political stuff is out of your systems @ random: no hard feelings mate. just lively debate. Of course, that's what Ive been trying to say all along! But it makes perfect sense for America to choose Iraq as the first country to start its empire building. For two reasons - one, as I already mentioned in that other thread, the world's running out of oil, and the Middle East has 3 times the oil the west does. And two, due to the current political climate, Muslims are in very low favour with the common American right now, so the Bush administration probably assumed that people wouldn't kick up much fuss if an Islamic country was invaded.PS and the orders to torture the prisoners came from the top teir of Government, so it makes no difference which 'individuals' armies are made up of.PPS enjoy your trip! Edited May 18, 2004 by random guy
AntiWinner22 Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 but there's no way in hell they'd strip prisoners naked and put them in sexual poses then take photographs of themwhy not? are they perfect? an army is made up of individuls, and a good pecentage of the people the military attracts are the testosterone fueled bullies, who would do such things. if the austrailian army is free of opertunistic bullies. good for you guys! but I don't buy it. and the USA isn't trying to raise an empire. if that were the case it would make much more sense to take bordering countries and grow outwards a US state halfway across the world in a god forsaken desert doesn't make sense. and would never be safe.Is the US trying to secure it's influance in the middle east? Of course it is. edit in: i've got a plane to catch, i'll talk to you guys when i get to AZ. hopefully by then all this political stuff is out of your systems @ random: no hard feelings mate. just lively debate. The empire thing reminded me of a story (this is an analogy, by the way): There were two ships out as sea; one was a pirate ship, the other a Roman ship. The Roman ship encounters the pirate ship taking a couple of boats of their treasures. The Romans immidiately try to stop the pirate ship. The pirate ship then tells the Roman ship, "When we steal, its called a crime. When you steal its called 'advancing the Empire.' Is it beause the size of our ship that we cannot 'advance?' Anon.
Gryph Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 but there's no way in hell they'd strip prisoners naked and put them in sexual poses then take photographs of themwhy not? are they perfect? an army is made up of individuls, and a good pecentage of the people the military attracts are the testosterone fueled bullies, who would do such things. if the austrailian army is free of opertunistic bullies. good for you guys! but I don't buy it. and the USA isn't trying to raise an empire. if that were the case it would make much more sense to take bordering countries and grow outwards a US state halfway across the world in a god forsaken desert doesn't make sense. and would never be safe.Is the US trying to secure it's influance in the middle east? Of course it is. edit in: i've got a plane to catch, i'll talk to you guys when i get to AZ. hopefully by then all this political stuff is out of your systems @ random: no hard feelings mate. just lively debate. The empire thing reminded me of a story (this is an analogy, by the way): There were two ships out as sea; one was a pirate ship, the other a Roman ship. The Roman ship encounters the pirate ship taking a couple of boats of their treasures. The Romans immidiately try to stop the pirate ship. The pirate ship then tells the Roman ship, "When we steal, its called a crime. When you steal its called 'advancing the Empire.' Is it beause the size of our ship that we cannot 'advance?' Anon. It's not the size of the ship that counts, it's how you use it. But bombing hospitals is just wrong. Especially if I'm going to be in that hospital, just wait till I leave and then drop those damn bombs! But seriously, to bomb a hospital for any reason is like bombing the Red Cross. Civilized nations shouldn't do it but those dirty subhuman terrorists will. I saw a PBS special on the US mobile hospitals (I think it was Frontline) and they showed the state of Iraqi hospitals which was just terrible. They were overcrowded, understaffed, and without enough medicine or supplies. The Iraqi doctors had to go to the Army mobile hospitals to get supplies sometimes. It's just terrible that a country cannot help its citizens who are being hurt by the invading force. But most of this is also not the Army's fault, but the embargos placed on Iraq.
Ash_crimson Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 before you take my statement out of proportion and start thinking im in agreement of bombing innocent civilians or hospitals ill just say that im not .now from a military look on the subject... people = problems... take hospitals out of the equasion (dont think thats spelt right) then theres gonna be alot of people dying... deaths of opposition regardless of whether theyre innocent or not makes it easier...soldiers are trained to not have a conscience... theyre trained to win... theyll do it by any means nessacery... its been proven theyll go to any lengths in previous wars... having laws in wars doesnt matter aslong as you win... (again thats my idea of how militiary look on the subject)
OverlordMondo Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 As much as I enjoy mass murders and violence, war is too costly, even for my tastes. We should bring back good ol' colloseums and have gladiator battles again.
Wizard Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 As much as I enjoy mass murders and violence, war is too costly, even for my tastes. We should bring back good ol' colloseums and have gladiator battles again.I'll save that stuff for the movies. IRL, it's just too close.
Gryph Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 As much as I enjoy mass murders and violence, war is too costly, even for my tastes. We should bring back good ol' colloseums and have gladiator battles again.That would be awesome! Now all we have are these lame wrestling matches where no one gets killed (except for Brett Hart) or eaten by wild beasts. Bring back the good ol days!! Make the terrorists fight a gigantic bear high on angel dust. Now that's what I call entertainment.
Wizard Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 As much as I enjoy mass murders and violence, war is too costly, even for my tastes. We should bring back good ol' colloseums and have gladiator battles again.That would be awesome! Now all we have are these lame wrestling matches where no one gets killed (except for Brett Hart) or eaten by wild beasts. Bring back the good ol days!! Make the terrorists fight a gigantic bear high on angel dust. Now that's what I call entertainment. It was Owen Heart (R.I.P. one of the greatest wrestlers i've ever seen)
Ash_crimson Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 As much as I enjoy mass murders and violence, war is too costly, even for my tastes. We should bring back good ol' colloseums and have gladiator battles again.That would be awesome! Now all we have are these lame wrestling matches where no one gets killed (except for Brett Hart) or eaten by wild beasts. Bring back the good ol days!! Make the terrorists fight a gigantic bear high on angel dust. Now that's what I call entertainment. It was Owen Heart (R.I.P. one of the greatest wrestlers i've ever seen) hell live on.... theres a little blue blazer in all of us....
OverlordMondo Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 Maybe we could even replace wars with colloseum battles.That'd be weird though. Might end up to easy to invade.
Cominus Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 As much as I enjoy mass murders and violence, war is too costly, even for my tastes. We should bring back good ol' colloseums and have gladiator battles again.Now what would that do? Rome fell and they had the colosium. Thar=ts point less, except when they yell spanard then i'll be like "where's maximus"
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now