Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I started running this the day it went up, and thus far I'm pretty impressed. I did manage to somehow completely break IE8, but i went back into it's settings and set everything back to default and it fixed itself. Overall, it's very well set up, and overall a very good experience. I did notice a few quirks here and there, but that's to be expected from beta software.

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

You should submit those bugs and quirks because some people who did that with Vista beta got free copies of Vista Ultimate.

Posted
You should submit those bugs and quirks because some people who did that with Vista beta got free copies of Vista Ultimate.

i've been submitting them :)

Posted

HAvent seen much diffs...

ALl i do is type, play games and surf da web...

So not sure between doinng those things i was suppose to find something that stand out..

Posted

I haven't run into any bugs at all.

but then I only surf, listen to music, watch movies, light word processing, torrent, and burn DVDs. but it seems snappier then vista.

Posted

THe only question is how big will the gap be between this beta and the full version that may costs 4 of my paychecks?

Posted

I like how Gryph had to remind all of you that it's a beta.

 

As for me, friend brought over a spare box and we installed it. Runs like a dream and it's awesome. Getting a lot of "Best Windows" since 2k from tech friends.

Posted
I like how Gryph had to remind all of you that it's a beta.

 

The topic is Windows 7 Beta?

 

I've been running it for a couple of days and I can't say it seems any faster than Vista or makes life any easier. It uses almost identical amounts of RAM (700+ MB) that Vista did, nor would I say it booted any quicker. I am having difficulty in installing some apps, and others have text/gfx glitches, but on the whole it is entirely useable (for a Beta) :naughty:

Posted

Won't blow my money on any, if I do bother to switch over I'll be :D 'ing it, and for more reasons than 1 but the simple fact that an OS isn't worth $500......

Posted (edited)

I did stick with the beta for a few days but a lot of installers wouldn't work due to it identifying itself as MCE 6.1 or something. I decided to give Vista64 a try and it is blistering. Although it uses 3 times the ram of XP and a shade more CPU, it is quick. I haven't had any driver problems either. I'd have to say it's the best Windows I have used. Hopefully Windows 7 rounds out a bit more over the coming months and I'll switch to the 64-bit version of that.

Edited by gavin19
Posted

If this beta is ultimate then f*** that!

I barely saw any difference, i hate to d/l OS and take money from my fav comp brand, so i wont even dl or buy it....what a waste!

WTF do we need so many diff version for!??!?! MAn Windows is getting cheap!

1.Starter

2.Home Basic

3.Home Premium

4.Business

5.Ultimate. <---Beta

PFTTT! Kick rocks PC!

Posted

For the general public it's between Home and Ultimate really. I don't see the problem with giving people the choice. If you don't want/need all the extras that Ultimate offers then you aren't forced into it. Go for either of the two Home versions. Starter/Business don't come into the picture.

Posted

someone had asked if you could install it to an external HDD and boot it from there? You can but you lose a little speed with opening and running things off of it. It's not like media transport from external hdd. All you do to boot the installed OS from external HDD is change your settings on boot order in your bios. If you have a somewhat new PC then it would have USB, or legacy USB in the boot menu. Just put that first before your optical drive, or internals, and it will boot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...