Wizard Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 Fscked Up. When did an individual become the equivelent of the masses?
Agozer Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 Since overprotective parents got in charge of things.
Weirdy Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 it shows how lawsuit-happy rich ppl here in the u.s are
Gryph Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 Another reason why Wal-Mart blows. I have to go to another town just to get the new George Carlin book because they think the cover is a big mockery of God (which it is).
Weirdy Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 Another reason why Wal-Mart blows. I have to go to another town just to get the new George Carlin book because they think the cover is a big mockery of God (which it is).<{POST_SNAPBACK}>hooray for Target
Agozer Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 If Wal-Mart ever comes this way, I'll surely boycott it.
taratata Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 (edited) flocking puritans... What's the problem with "flock"? It's just a word. I'd be much more offended by the censoring than by the lyrics themselves.EDIT:"While Wal-Mart sets high standards, it would not be possible to eliminate every image, word or topic that an individual might find objectionable," Whitcomb told the newspaper.He's so right, so why try in the first place? Edited December 11, 2004 by taratata
Daeval Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 I like this:He dismissed Whitcomb's suggestion that Wal-Mart stores didn't know about the censored version of the song. "They are a multimillion-dollar corporation and they certainly can communicate among their various entities," he said.This guy obviously has no idea how multimillion dollar corporations work. He's probably as naive and sheltered as his clients. While I wouldn't normally support wal-mart, it's a case of lesser evil at this point. It's one thing for a big company to be jerks for profit, but another thing entirely for an individual family to be complete idiots. It takes a lot less bureaucracy to be decent human beings as a family. I bet they even yelled at the retail clerk.
taratata Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 I like this:He dismissed Whitcomb's suggestion that Wal-Mart stores didn't know about the censored version of the song. "They are a multimillion-dollar corporation and they certainly can communicate among their various entities," he said.This guy obviously has no idea how multimillion dollar corporations work. He's probably as naive and sheltered as his clients. While I wouldn't normally support wal-mart, it's a case of lesser evil at this point. It's one thing for a big company to be jerks for profit, but another thing entirely for an individual family to be complete idiots. It takes a lot less bureaucracy to be decent human beings as a family. I bet they even yelled at the retail clerk.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>I don't think he's naive, but his speech is clearly for naive people (and flocking puritan morons).
Daeval Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 I like this:He dismissed Whitcomb's suggestion that Wal-Mart stores didn't know about the censored version of the song. "They are a multimillion-dollar corporation and they certainly can communicate among their various entities," he said.This guy obviously has no idea how multimillion dollar corporations work. He's probably as naive and sheltered as his clients. While I wouldn't normally support wal-mart, it's a case of lesser evil at this point. It's one thing for a big company to be jerks for profit, but another thing entirely for an individual family to be complete idiots. It takes a lot less bureaucracy to be decent human beings as a family. I bet they even yelled at the retail clerk.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>I don't think he's naive, but his speech is clearly for naive people (and flocking puritan morons).<{POST_SNAPBACK}> I have a feeling walmart is going to pwn him in court, in which case he might look a little naive. I'd say "we'll find out," except I'm not likely to pay any attention to this in the future.
Sultan Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 That's funny, Wal-mart getting screwed by their own stupid policy. Down with wal-mart!
alexis Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 what's wrong with you people? Well, all in all, any idiot could try suit anyone, the scary thing is that they are being paid attention, oh come on, in case it contains the F word and you do not want your kids to hear, just return the freaking Cd and get a Backstreet boys one, you rchiledren will love it
Gryph Posted December 11, 2004 Posted December 11, 2004 what's wrong with you people? Well, all in all, any idiot could try suit anyone, the scary thing is that they are being paid attention, oh come on, in case it contains the F word and you do not want your kids to hear, just return the freaking Cd and get a Backstreet boys one, you rchiledren will love it <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well they are suing because Walmart wasn't supposed to carry them in the first place. I love how they changed Nirvana's "Rape Me" to "Wafe Me." That was just classic.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now