Wizard Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 I'm wrong, i'm wrong, i'm wrong, i'm wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 (edited) All is well now I guess. I was about to close this thread since you were getting too bitchy about stuff, but I'll let it slide for now. Edited September 17, 2004 by Agozer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 Yeah i'm gonna quit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 (edited) These are TWEAKS and not flock/n INPUT LAG. What's wrong with you? You were saying the responsiveness was wrong. Now you are saying something completely different. And I've said I don't care about these tweaks, they ARE improvements. Just because the arcade version was first, who says that is the best?. The tweaks won't make THAT much difference anyway. I'd still kick your ass with Hugo, DC version or arcade version. I wish someone would remove the stupid infinites from the Marvel games so I could have fair games. But I suppose you would hate that improvement just because it isn't the same as the original. EDIT: This too bitchy? close it if you want. You've already closed half of the threads in the current affairs section anyway. "Power" Trip? I don't see the other new moderator Gryphonklaw closing as many threads as possible. So what if we are arguing? There is no reason to close threads as future readers could read it and make contributions. We've already discussed the SF3 conversion, now we are going more in-depth. Just because you have a close topic button doesn't mean you should use it as often as possible. When was the last time Gamecop closed a thread because of "arguing"? You should show more discretion with closing threads. Someone new could still have a worthwhile contribution to an eight month old topic. Don't ruin the forum just because you could. If it's a complete slagging match that is completely off topic maybe, but not healthy disagreement. Edited September 17, 2004 by shin_nihon_kikaku Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 (edited) These are TWEAKS and not flock/n INPUT LAG. What's wrong with you? You were saying the responsiveness was wrong. Now you are saying something completely different. And I've said I don't care about these tweaks, they ARE improvements. Just because the arcade version was first, who says that is the best?. The tweaks won't make THAT much difference anyway. I'd still kick your ass with Hugo, DC version or arcade version. I wish someone would remove the stupid infinites from the Marvel games so I could have fair games. But I suppose you would hate that improvement just because it isn't the same as the original.I think everyone whos played MVC2 would agree with you. Curse Jwong's stupidly made skills. Grab an Xbox, get Xbox live and SF3, Ibuki ownage will reign. Unless you're YSB, there isn't any greater Hugo player i've seen then him. Edited September 17, 2004 by K`dash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 I think everyone whos played MVC2 would agree with you. Curse Jwong's stupidly made skills. Grab an Xbox, get Xbox live and SF3, Ibuki ownage will reign. Unless you're YSB, there isn't any greater Hugo player i've seen then him.I doubt I'll ever get xbox live but I'd like to challenge you. And no, I'm not really a Hugo specialist, I try to play as every character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 Then do you agree that Ken > Ryu gameplay wise? Cuz we can agree on that if you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 (edited) What about ken and ryu? If you mean ken isn't as good as ryu. you're right. He's NEVER been as good despite the extra moves. Ryu is perfectly balanced and virtually un-beatable in all SFs (when played by someone who knows SF inside out) The only time an argument could be made for ken being best is in champion edition, when ken's moves offered improvements over ryu's. (knock down cyclone kick not being enough) Edited September 17, 2004 by shin_nihon_kikaku Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 Yeah I can work with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 Sure, I don't disagree with people for the sake of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoomBa_GoosE Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 yes, i agree with u two. ken is an awesome character, but Ryu to me is for someone who is more skillful in my opinion. between the two, though ken is more of a playable fighter for any fighting game fan, Ryu has always been more balanced and technical than ken...yay we all agree on sumthin =) and yeah, lets not close so many threads so quick...sometimes its kool to see some people contribute to the older threads...gives me somethin more to read in this forum..but nonetheless...everyone...lets be like him ---> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now