Agozer Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 (edited) All is well now I guess. I was about to close this thread since you were getting too bitchy about stuff, but I'll let it slide for now. Edited September 17, 2004 by Agozer
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Posted September 17, 2004 (edited) These are TWEAKS and not flock/n INPUT LAG. What's wrong with you? You were saying the responsiveness was wrong. Now you are saying something completely different. And I've said I don't care about these tweaks, they ARE improvements. Just because the arcade version was first, who says that is the best?. The tweaks won't make THAT much difference anyway. I'd still kick your ass with Hugo, DC version or arcade version. I wish someone would remove the stupid infinites from the Marvel games so I could have fair games. But I suppose you would hate that improvement just because it isn't the same as the original. EDIT: This too bitchy? close it if you want. You've already closed half of the threads in the current affairs section anyway. "Power" Trip? I don't see the other new moderator Gryphonklaw closing as many threads as possible. So what if we are arguing? There is no reason to close threads as future readers could read it and make contributions. We've already discussed the SF3 conversion, now we are going more in-depth. Just because you have a close topic button doesn't mean you should use it as often as possible. When was the last time Gamecop closed a thread because of "arguing"? You should show more discretion with closing threads. Someone new could still have a worthwhile contribution to an eight month old topic. Don't ruin the forum just because you could. If it's a complete slagging match that is completely off topic maybe, but not healthy disagreement. Edited September 17, 2004 by shin_nihon_kikaku
Wizard Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 (edited) These are TWEAKS and not flock/n INPUT LAG. What's wrong with you? You were saying the responsiveness was wrong. Now you are saying something completely different. And I've said I don't care about these tweaks, they ARE improvements. Just because the arcade version was first, who says that is the best?. The tweaks won't make THAT much difference anyway. I'd still kick your ass with Hugo, DC version or arcade version. I wish someone would remove the stupid infinites from the Marvel games so I could have fair games. But I suppose you would hate that improvement just because it isn't the same as the original.I think everyone whos played MVC2 would agree with you. Curse Jwong's stupidly made skills. Grab an Xbox, get Xbox live and SF3, Ibuki ownage will reign. Unless you're YSB, there isn't any greater Hugo player i've seen then him. Edited September 17, 2004 by K`dash
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Posted September 17, 2004 I think everyone whos played MVC2 would agree with you. Curse Jwong's stupidly made skills. Grab an Xbox, get Xbox live and SF3, Ibuki ownage will reign. Unless you're YSB, there isn't any greater Hugo player i've seen then him.I doubt I'll ever get xbox live but I'd like to challenge you. And no, I'm not really a Hugo specialist, I try to play as every character.
Wizard Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 Then do you agree that Ken > Ryu gameplay wise? Cuz we can agree on that if you want.
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Posted September 17, 2004 (edited) What about ken and ryu? If you mean ken isn't as good as ryu. you're right. He's NEVER been as good despite the extra moves. Ryu is perfectly balanced and virtually un-beatable in all SFs (when played by someone who knows SF inside out) The only time an argument could be made for ken being best is in champion edition, when ken's moves offered improvements over ryu's. (knock down cyclone kick not being enough) Edited September 17, 2004 by shin_nihon_kikaku
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Posted September 17, 2004 Sure, I don't disagree with people for the sake of it.
BoomBa_GoosE Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 yes, i agree with u two. ken is an awesome character, but Ryu to me is for someone who is more skillful in my opinion. between the two, though ken is more of a playable fighter for any fighting game fan, Ryu has always been more balanced and technical than ken...yay we all agree on sumthin =) and yeah, lets not close so many threads so quick...sometimes its kool to see some people contribute to the older threads...gives me somethin more to read in this forum..but nonetheless...everyone...lets be like him --->
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Posted September 17, 2004 I don't know whether some random character is more powerful than another though - say (shingo versus lin in KOF2000 or Paul versus Heihachi in Tekken 3). I like to play as every character in every fighting game and learn all their moves and tactics just to a high degree rather than excel with one or two. Same way that i don't like people who would stick with one super art in SF3 just because a FAQ said it was thye most powerful. I like mixing it up to an insane degree in all fighting games.
Wizard Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 Yeah so do I in fighting games. Sometimes using the really obsucre characters or those got severaly nerfed ( Ibuki :`( ) is uber fun. Anyways, Out of all the SF3 games, 3s is the most balanced I think, dispite the fact that Ibuki, Sean and noticable others got nerfed, most notably Ibuki and Sean.
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Posted September 17, 2004 What I HATE is people who stick to the same old, same old just because it works. One of the worst examples, and pushing sticking in a rut to the extreme, is when in tag team games such as the marvel vs series, people choose the same combinations of characters. So you think Wolverine is so powerful at least team him up with cyclops, then ryu, then sabretooth. I fight people who choose Wolverine and Roll EVERY time. Man that sucks. they want to win that much they don't play the game properly. People probably even stick to the same three characters in games like KOF and MVC2. You've got an even bigger safety net for experimentation in these games. Jeez.
Wizard Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 I want my Ibuki back damnit *starts crying*
shin_nihon_kikaku Posted September 17, 2004 Author Posted September 17, 2004 Do you mean Ibuki and Sean are poor? I think Ibuki is ridiculously powerful, keeping with the tradition of capcom females. They always try too hard to make them better than the other characters. Her moves list (almost twice as many moves as everyone else) proves that. I don't like using Ibuki against my brother (who's the only person I play with all the time) because she's so tough.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now