Alpha Posted April 14, 2004 Posted April 14, 2004 It seems that Goldeneye 2 will be now worked on by Electronic Arts, since now they have all the rights. What sucks is RARE the previous owner is what made the first Goldeneye so good. He is what the people said in EGM Magazine...
Gryph Posted April 14, 2004 Posted April 14, 2004 Lets hope this game won't be a disaster like the last Bond FPS released by EA.
random guy Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 I see Golden Eye 2 is going to have on-line gaming "only on the PS2 version". It was the same for Red Faction II you could play on-line/multiplayer on the ps2 version but NOT on the PC version? What is going on when consoles receive priority with on-line gaming over PCs where on-line gaming was born?
AntiWinner22 Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 Lets hope this game won't be a disaster like the last Bond FPS released by EA.Everything or Nothing wasn't THAT bad. I liked it. Better then XIII. Anon.
Gryph Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 Lets hope this game won't be a disaster like the last Bond FPS released by EA.Everything or Nothing wasn't THAT bad. I liked it. Better then XIII. Anon. No no, the game before that. Everything or Nothing was a 3rd person action. There was another Bond FPS released last year. Agent Under Fire, that game bit ass.
AntiWinner22 Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 Lets hope this game won't be a disaster like the last Bond FPS released by EA.Everything or Nothing wasn't THAT bad. I liked it. Better then XIII. Anon. No no, the game before that. Everything or Nothing was a 3rd person action. There was another Bond FPS released last year. Agent Under Fire, that game bit ass. I think Everything or Nothing has some FPS in it too.
Gryph Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 Lets hope this game won't be a disaster like the last Bond FPS released by EA.Everything or Nothing wasn't THAT bad. I liked it. Better then XIII. Anon. No no, the game before that. Everything or Nothing was a 3rd person action. There was another Bond FPS released last year. Agent Under Fire, that game bit ass. I think Everything or Nothing has some FPS in it too. Yeah, but Agent Under Fire is a full fledged FPS.
Shibathedog Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 Agent Under Fire? Their latest FPS was Nightfire though, Dont you mean Nightfire? Ive heard of this, I already know its going to blow, or at least i think it is They are not going to have Free Radical do any work on it, which is the company that was formed from the Goldeneye developers, who made Timesplitters, Timesplitters 2, and Perfect Dark, just to name a few. If it is good, im pretty sure its safe to say it will be almost nothing like the original
Gryph Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 Agent Under Fire? Their latest FPS was Nightfire though, Dont you mean Nightfire? Ive heard of this, I already know its going to blow, or at least i think it is They are not going to have Free Radical do any work on it, which is the company that was formed from the Goldeneye developers, who made Timesplitters, Timesplitters 2, and Perfect Dark, just to name a few. If it is good, im pretty sure its safe to say it will be almost nothing like the originalYeah...that's it. It wasn't good whatever it was called.
AntiWinner22 Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 Agent Under Fire? Their latest FPS was Nightfire though, Dont you mean Nightfire? Ive heard of this, I already know its going to blow, or at least i think it is They are not going to have Free Radical do any work on it, which is the company that was formed from the Goldeneye developers, who made Timesplitters, Timesplitters 2, and Perfect Dark, just to name a few. If it is good, im pretty sure its safe to say it will be almost nothing like the originalThen again, this could turn out to be like the Tony Hawk series... NO ONE tought that it could improve from 2 to 3... How wrong they were... Anon.
Agozer Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 All the Bond games after GoldenEye have been more or less shite. Let's just hope that the new installment does things like it's supposed to.
Shibathedog Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 I agree, Although The World Is Not Enough for N64 wasnt THAT bad...although the multiplayer was complete crap
Mag Posted April 15, 2004 Posted April 15, 2004 this is bad, I knew for sure, Electronic Arts doesnt have that type of developement aspect to create such a sequel from the n64 greatest hit, Goldeneye. EA has made previous bond titles but they are not even close to be as good as goldeneye. Have RARE to develope this sequel, i know EA doesnt have that sort of franchise.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now