What do you use besides WinAmp?

[Samor]

foobar2000 on my laptop, because it's less bloated.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

All the "bloat", as you call it, is optional in Winamp.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

yes, optional...foobar is fast with everything in.

[Tynvar]

I use iTunes to keep my files organized. But I listen to most with winamp.

[Weirdy]

I use iTunes to keep my files organized.  But I listen to most with winamp.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

That's the thing I hate most about itunes (besides the fact that it's a vram whore). I once allowed it to keep my music folder "organized" and it moved everything; it even edited tags.

[garyoak99]

I switched to foobar2000

Winamp is too bloated and had a lot of security issues lately.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

This is the first time I've ever heard WinAmp having any security issues!

 

What are these WinAmp security issues?

[Agozer]

There has been a ton of security and bugfixes in the latest Winamp 5.2 and every reelase after the initial v5 release.

[Gryph]

I use Winamp and have used it since forever. I tried musikcube once and it was alright. Haven't really given Foobar a try yet. Does it have a plugin that lets it become a single thin bar like Winamp does if you double click on it? That's practicaly the main reason I use Winamp since I don't use any of the other options. Sometimes I use the Shoutcast browser though.

[Weirdy]

Foobar does have that I think, but not for the latest RC (since the SDK isn't publically available). Once 0.9 becomes stable, then you'd have to wait a while.

 

Either way, I don't need that since I use Hotkeycontrolxp. (old version because the latest is shareware)

 

ATM, I'm using winamp because....idk why. In fact, I have no excuse to use foobar. It doesn't sound better. The only thing I like about foobar is the fact that it can read the replaygain values on all files.

 

The latest shoutcast browser on winamp is cool but really slow with response. Really laggy, but it's experimental. I like it because I have found some good stations.

Edited March 7, 2006 by Weirdy

[iq_132]

Winamp for mp3/ogg/adx media player classic for everything else.

[garyoak99]

There has been a ton of security and bugfixes in the latest Winamp 5.2 and every reelase after the initial v5 release.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Okay...I'll check what WinAmp version my brother has now. He only has version 5.1 Surround Edition. Is that secure enough?

[retroK]

5.1 is not secure!

 

Here some more info:

 

http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA06-032A.html

http://secunia.com/advisories/18649/

http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/0361

[garyoak99]

5.1 is not secure!

 

Here some more info:

 

http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA06-032A.html

http://secunia.com/advisories/18649/

http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/0361

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Thank you! I will convince my brother to update WinAmp using the above links as evidence as soon as I see him. I will spare your life in the forum attack system as a reward!

[Weirdy]

Make sure he saves his playlists and does a clean install

[CJ Jackson]

I used winamp but I have tried foobar but I don't like the way random function works.

 

I prefer winamp even through it take more memory so what I got 1GB of ram, the feature on winamp is all I need really also, I tried out Windows Media Player 10 I didn't seem to like it as much as the Classic. (WMP10 came as standard with my os; winxp x64)

[Weirdy]

I think I'll stick with winamp. *browses through shoutcast stations*

[Wizard]

I used winamp but I have tried foobar but I don't like the way random function works.

 

I prefer winamp even through it take more memory so what I got 1GB of ram, the feature on winamp is all I need really also, I tried out Windows Media Player 10 I didn't seem to like it as much as the Classic. (WMP10 came as standard with my os; winxp x64)

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Like 6 MB makes a computer with 1GB any different