Wizard Posted March 13, 2004 Posted March 13, 2004 Thats because the PS2 cant handle sprites natrually. It was originally ment to only render 3D. Dreamcast would be the 2nd system for "Arcade Perfect" ports, besides the Neo-Geo.
ForceX Posted March 13, 2004 Posted March 13, 2004 - The current issue of Famitsu reported that Capcom will release a PS2 port of Street Fighter III 3rd Strike in Japan later this year it is currently undecided whether the game will have online matching support. - the magic-box WHY!!!!!!, it's only for DC damn It!!!!!YAY!!!!!! Hopefully it gets released outside of Japan If it doesn't have online play then it will suck
Agozer Posted March 13, 2004 Posted March 13, 2004 - The current issue of Famitsu reported that Capcom will release a PS2 port of Street Fighter III 3rd Strike in Japan later this year it is currently undecided whether the game will have online matching support. - the magic-box WHY!!!!!!, it's only for DC damn It!!!!!YAY!!!!!! Hopefully it gets released outside of Japan If it doesn't have online play then it will suck Personally, I really don't care about the online play (consoles were never meant to go online, IMO...PCs are for that), but it would be damn sweet if SFIII would be released all over the world.
Shibathedog Posted March 13, 2004 Posted March 13, 2004 Capcom Vs. SNK 2 EO or whatever they call it for Xbox blows, sure it has online, but its so...unresponsive...and slowed down... DC rules because its like having an arcade in your house, and arcade games are the most fun, and it has tons of awsome 2D fighters I mean, look at the notrocious fighters that have been coming out, Mortal Kombat Deadly Alliance? That game was a JOKE
Gryph Posted March 13, 2004 Posted March 13, 2004 I mean, look at the notrocious fighters that have been coming out, Mortal Kombat Deadly Alliance? That game was a JOKEMan, what the flock are you talking about. That game was teh 0wn!
Sane Posted March 13, 2004 Posted March 13, 2004 Technically speaking the DC port os SF III: TS is not arcade perfect, it misses a few frames here and there.....or so people say. Who cares really? It looks and plays beautifully. About the controller, yes the DC controller stinks for Street Fighter games, so does the psx pad and so does the xbox pad. Not only are the d-pads not ideal for the moves (although the DC's one is best) but most importantly, they only have 4 face buttons (yes xbox has more but they're not placed nicely for a good street fighter setup). Do as I did, buy a saturn pad converter for DC, it's the best way to go for people who don't have/can't play with (like me ) arcade sticks. About the port itself, that is only a good thing of course. A good game should be on as many platforms as possible so everyone can enjoy it. I never understood that silly it-should-stay-exclusive mentality, but I guess I'm oldfashioned .
ForceX Posted March 14, 2004 Posted March 14, 2004 - The current issue of Famitsu reported that Capcom will release a PS2 port of Street Fighter III 3rd Strike in Japan later this year it is currently undecided whether the game will have online matching support. - the magic-box WHY!!!!!!, it's only for DC damn It!!!!!YAY!!!!!! Hopefully it gets released outside of Japan If it doesn't have online play then it will suck Personally, I really don't care about the online play (consoles were never meant to go online, IMO...PCs are for that), but it would be damn sweet if SFIII would be released all over the world. Consoles were IMHO destined to go online....they are the successor to the PC...for gaming that is (FPS being the exception)
Gouken Posted March 14, 2004 Posted March 14, 2004 Consoles were IMHO destined to go online....they are the successor to the PC...for gaming that is (FPS being the exception)I have to disagree. Consoles really shouldnt go online at all in my opinion. Even though most video game players come from my generation (the early 80's) and are able to pay for an online service, most kid's of course can't. And they are the target audience game manufacturers advertise for. I've seen the way some parents my age treat their children these days. Using video games as a babysitter most of the time. I feel ashamed of the parent willing to pay more just so they don't have to actually spend time with their children. Wow, did I go off topic! I gotta stop watching the news. let the flames begin!
ForceX Posted March 14, 2004 Posted March 14, 2004 I started gaming back in the early 90's and it was fun playing with friends but nowadays not many people have the time to come over to someone elses house to play videogames... But with online play you can play against anyone, anywhere, at anytime. This also adds more life to games as your opponent will usually be different with different skillz.... Anyways, todays videogames are targeted at older kids (15 >) not kids who are real young.....
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now