Wizard Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 Sony still got their TVs working right, and that's all that matters. They got some pretty damn nice TVs.
DropDeadEd Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 The news is out. Final Fantasy XIII is no longer a Playstation exclusive. That's what Sony gets for sucking so hard. Has that stepped out of rumour-territory yet? The 'XIII series' I know is not exclusive, but I gather that only refers to the spin-off games for DS, phones and possibly the 360- is 'Final Fantasy XIII' itself now officially getting a 360 release? That will be a blow to Sony however they cut it. wasn't XI also released as a set for the 360? Not that exclusive.
Alpha Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 I don't even think the loss of the exclusive for Final Fantasy was a big blow to Sony. By far, the biggest blow was the loss of the Grand Theft Auto Series. I could picture all the kids pleading with their mommies and daddies to purchase the system so they can buy the game.
DropDeadEd Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 I don't even think the loss of the exclusive for Final Fantasy was a big blow to Sony. By far, the biggest blow was the loss of the Grand Theft Auto Series. I could picture all the kids pleading with their mommies and daddies to purchase the system so they can buy the game. It would really depend. Sony is kind of falling on hard times as of late.
Alpha Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 I don't even think the loss of the exclusive for Final Fantasy was a big blow to Sony. By far, the biggest blow was the loss of the Grand Theft Auto Series. I could picture all the kids pleading with their mommies and daddies to purchase the system so they can buy the game. It would really depend. Sony is kind of falling on hard times as of late.If Sony would just stop wasting their time with all these pointless firmware releases and paying these programmers 24/7 to battle these crackers -- they may have gotten somewhere by now. They should just be happy the PS2 is on a respirator since the PS3 has already died.
DropDeadEd Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 I don't even think the loss of the exclusive for Final Fantasy was a big blow to Sony. By far, the biggest blow was the loss of the Grand Theft Auto Series. I could picture all the kids pleading with their mommies and daddies to purchase the system so they can buy the game. It would really depend. Sony is kind of falling on hard times as of late.If Sony would just stop wasting their time with all these pointless firmware releases and paying these programmers 24/7 to battle these crackers -- they may have gotten somewhere by now. They should just be happy the PS2 is on a respirator since the PS3 has already died. I sold all but one of my PS3's. I made a lot of money back for a crappy system =/And yes they would. That and the fact the porn industry has gone with HD DVD. They lost a lot of money there.
BlackKnight Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 If Sony would just stop wasting their time with all these pointless firmware releases and paying these programmers 24/7 to battle these crackers -- they may have gotten somewhere by now. They should just be happy the PS2 is on a respirator since the PS3 has already died. Agreed. Take the PSP for instance- there is so much potential for the little beast, but instead the constant stream of updates is geared toward ultimately unsuccessful security fixes. Who cares? It is the tiniest majority that take advantage of exploits anyway, and even then they do not necessarily stop buying games because of it. Why not spend the time making the machine a more attractive proposition to potential buyers? Anyway they have taken it easy with the PSP so far, but its about now that they really have to step their game up. Now's also a good time to hype up all that PSP-PS3 connectivity of which nothing has come so far. That and the fact the porn industry has gone with HD DVD. They lost a lot of money there. I don't think Blu-Ray is faring as bad as people like to think. JB Hi Fi, which is probably the biggest DVD retail shifter in Australia is backing it exclusively and not stocking HDDVD at all. Not that it matters to the rest of the world, but the format is certainly far from dead. And I don't think the porn industry is a major concern for Sony. They actively opposed the early adoption of the UMD as the porn media of choice in Japan.
DropDeadEd Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 If Sony would just stop wasting their time with all these pointless firmware releases and paying these programmers 24/7 to battle these crackers -- they may have gotten somewhere by now. They should just be happy the PS2 is on a respirator since the PS3 has already died. Agreed. Take the PSP for instance- there is so much potential for the little beast, but instead the constant stream of updates is geared toward ultimately unsuccessful security fixes. Who cares? It is the tiniest majority that take advantage of exploits anyway, and even then they do not necessarily stop buying games because of it. Why not spend the time making the machine a more attractive proposition to potential buyers? Anyway they have taken it easy with the PSP so far, but its about now that they really have to step their game up. Now's also a good time to hype up all that PSP-PS3 connectivity of which nothing has come so far. That and the fact the porn industry has gone with HD DVD. They lost a lot of money there. I don't think Blu-Ray is faring as bad as people like to think. JB Hi Fi, which is probably the biggest DVD retail shifter in Australia is backing it exclusively and not stocking HDDVD at all. Not that it matters to the rest of the world, but the format is certainly far from dead. And I don't think the porn industry is a major concern for Sony. They actively opposed the early adoption of the UMD as the porn media of choice in Japan. the U.S. Porn Industry is a major concern. But then again, region is a factor.
Alpha Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 Well, here is some news that was just released today. Walmart declares HD-DVD the winner over Blu-Ray What does this Mean? It means that any studio wanting Wal-Mart’s support after year end had better be selling HD DVD movies. Wal-Mart won’t be promoting Blu-Ray and, after year end, will increasingly focus their marketing on getting people to buy into HD DVD players and the related HD DVD movie from them. In short, the Blu-Ray aligned studios will now have to either support both formats or risk losing much of Wal-Mart's business and given how material this business is to them, you have to think that an anti-Wall-Mart decision would have a material impact on their bonuses and career longevity. It certainly puts Columbia Pictures, which is owned by Sony, in a particularly uncomfortable position. So, if this move by Wal-Mart is true, and it appears to be (but we won’t know for sure for a few months yet), the format war is likely over and Wal-Mart has declared the winner.
DropDeadEd Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 Well, here is some news that was just released today. Walmart declares HD-DVD the winner over Blu-Ray What does this Mean? It means that any studio wanting Wal-Mart’s support after year end had better be selling HD DVD movies. Wal-Mart won’t be promoting Blu-Ray and, after year end, will increasingly focus their marketing on getting people to buy into HD DVD players and the related HD DVD movie from them. In short, the Blu-Ray aligned studios will now have to either support both formats or risk losing much of Wal-Mart's business and given how material this business is to them, you have to think that an anti-Wall-Mart decision would have a material impact on their bonuses and career longevity. It certainly puts Columbia Pictures, which is owned by Sony, in a particularly uncomfortable position. So, if this move by Wal-Mart is true, and it appears to be (but we won’t know for sure for a few months yet), the format war is likely over and Wal-Mart has declared the winner. Hah, I was just about to post this also.
L.S.D Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 This seems to be the nail to Sony's coffin on Blu-Ray. My good DVD player is still usable and pirates still support it so it is all good I won't spot much difference in the resolution anyway
Alpha Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 This seems to be the nail to Sony's coffin on Blu-Ray. My good DVD player is still usable and pirates still support it so it is all good I won't spot much difference in the resolution anyway Seriously, I could care less about seeing some extra trees in a background scenary. HD is a complete waste of money IMO. Until we get 3D movies, 2D has already reached its peak.
BlackKnight Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 There is no difference in resolution - there are subtle compression differences and such but who cares. The main things are audio - in which BD wins hands down, and extras - which seem to be more thorough on HDDVD atm. Still, how can Walmart so casually throw its weight around in this instance? It seems to be extremely arrogant and almost illogical business practice to just dismiss an entire family of products on a whim. They must be in cahoots with the HD company big time.
Alpha Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 There is no difference in resolution - there are subtle compression differences and such but who cares. The main things are audio - in which BD wins hands down, and extras - which seem to be more thorough on HDDVD atm. Still, how can Walmart so casually throw its weight around in this instance? It seems to be extremely arrogant and almost illogical business practice to just dismiss an entire family of products on a whim. They must be in cahoots with the HD company big time.I wouldn't be surprised if Bill Gates handed them some cash underneath the table. Why not?
L.S.D Posted April 25, 2007 Posted April 25, 2007 This seems to be the nail to Sony's coffin on Blu-Ray. My good DVD player is still usable and pirates still support it so it is all good I won't spot much difference in the resolution anyway Seriously, I could care less about seeing some extra trees in a background scenary. HD is a complete waste of money IMO. Until we get 3D movies, 2D has already reached its peak.I agreed. The only quality difference (and I mean a huge one) is the difference between DVD and VCD (quite popular in Asia, due to karaoke and porn ). Furthermore, what do we get from HD/Blu ray movies?Extra contents - we can get it in DVDQuality sound - we can get it in DVDSUbtitles? - we can get it in DVDQuality picture - my TV can't spot the difference and so does I
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now