Wizard Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 I feel like killing the scenario writer at valve for the most inconsistant story ever. Even if some of it WAS intentional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 I feel like killing the scenario writer at valve for the most inconsistant story ever. Even if some of it WAS intentional.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>How's it inconsistant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 I feel like killing the scenario writer at valve for the most inconsistant story ever. Even if some of it WAS intentional.How's it inconsistant?It doesn't make much sense? As in a lot is not explained well enough or at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daeval Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 I feel like killing the scenario writer at valve for the most inconsistant story ever. Even if some of it WAS intentional.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>How's it inconsistant?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>It doesn't make much sense? As in a lot is not explained well enough or at all.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Agreed. The storytelling is excellent, but the story itself is so far kind of shoddy. They're going to have to start filling in holes eventually, if they have any plan for a real storyline. What they fill it with could make or break the background that they've laid out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 I feel like killing the scenario writer at valve for the most inconsistant story ever. Even if some of it WAS intentional.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>How's it inconsistant?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>It doesn't make much sense? As in a lot is not explained well enough or at all.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Well that's not inconsitency, that's something else entirely. But I do agree about it not being explained enough, it's not. But I love the way the story is told since you only know as much as Gordon knowns and nothing more. Most people are just too used to omniscient third person story telling so it's weird when they don't know what's all going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 I feel like killing the scenario writer at valve for the most inconsistant story ever. Even if some of it WAS intentional.How's it inconsistant?It doesn't make much sense? As in a lot is not explained well enough or at all.Well that's not inconsitency, that's something else entirely. But I do agree about it not being explained enough, it's not. But I love the way the story is told since you only know as much as Gordon knowns and nothing more. Most people are just too used to omniscient third person story telling so it's weird when they don't know what's all going on.Yeah, I know the difference between when something is inconsistant and when something doesn't make sense, but I got a brainfart :/ I like the story as much as you do, but I wish they would at least make a proper ending, even if VALVe aims for a trilogy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 Aftermath supposedly picks up right after the end in the Citadel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted April 20, 2005 Share Posted April 20, 2005 Aftermath supposedly picks up right after the end in the Citadel.Then it's a must-get for those who'd like to know what the flock really happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diso Posted April 21, 2005 Author Share Posted April 21, 2005 I feel like killing the scenario writer at valve for the most inconsistant story ever. Even if some of it WAS intentional.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>How's it inconsistant?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>It doesn't make much sense? As in a lot is not explained well enough or at all.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Well that's not inconsitency, that's something else entirely. But I do agree about it not being explained enough, it's not. But I love the way the story is told since you only know as much as Gordon knowns and nothing more. Most people are just too used to omniscient third person story telling so it's weird when they don't know what's all going on.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Yeah, I know the difference between when something is inconsistant and when something doesn't make sense, but I got a brainfart :/ I like the story as much as you do, but I wish they would at least make a proper ending, even if VALVe aims for a trilogy.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> I like the storyline Valve is making right now. By the time they get to the ending, all the different storylines and gapholes will untwine into one simple solution. Good thing about it is you don't get assholes that spoil the ending for everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 Some HL: Aftermath news. * Aftermath will be presented at E3 next month * The release date will be in Fall 2005 * The time to play it through will be about 1/3 of the time needed for HL2 * Aftermath will just be released via Steam, no retail-version is planned http://www.hlfallout.net/viewnews.php/7866/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agozer Posted April 21, 2005 Share Posted April 21, 2005 If it's only through Steam and you have to pay for it, I'm not getting it the "legal" way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now