Hentai (nude anime) disgusts me

[Alpha]

Do any of you sick freaks get your libido going by watching or looking at Hentai (anime porn)? I remember having to go through them stupid banner ads when I would try to enter 1Emulation in TOP50Emu years ago (before rule changes). It was utterly annoying and nasty.

 

The same goes with games. I remember back when "The Sims" came out and every one was downloading the patch to uncensor the nudity. And I know patches for other games were released as well that did the samething. Can you or anyone explain to me the significance of doing something like this?

 

Why not simply look at the real stuff? The same goes for people who buy games solely for looking at hot animated Asian girls. For example, anyone remember BMX XXX by Acclaim (before they went out of business)?

 

I just don't get it.

[L.S.D]

i don't get off from hentai. but i do love the way they draw human bodies. I love good arts.

[BlackKnight]

Here's an analogy for you. If you've ever seen a hot chick in a movie, googled her, and found her photoshoots, you're a hypocrite. Hell, if you've ever even gone to see a movie just because of some hot actress, that's the same thing too.

 

If you want to understand why horny kids look at hentai, think about that. You watch movies, kids watch anime. The difference is [insert anime girl here] doesn't go out and pose for FHM after the set closes.

[Alpha]

i don't get off from hentai. but i do love the way they draw human bodies. I love good arts.

So are you saying you would buy a game to see animated bouncing boobies? Dead or Alive anyone?

[BlackKnight]

Dead or Alive anyone?

Are you seriously going to write off everything good about Dead or Alive and say its just about the bouncing tits? Ever played it?

[Alpha]

Here's an analogy for you. If you've ever seen a hot chick in a movie, googled her, and found her photoshoots, you're a hypocrite. If you've ever even gone to see a movie because of some hot actress, it's the same thing.

 

If you want to understand why folks look at hentai, think about that. You watch movies, kids watch anime. The difference is [insert anime girl here] doesn't go out and pose for FHM after the set closes.

I disagree. The difference is the hentai girl is NOT REAL. You Google a woman you watch in a movie because she is a human being. You don't Google "anime actresses". Perhaps you may Google a character from a video game that you find awkwardly attractive. Either way, it's ridiculous.

 

Here's my philosophy ... if you can't find it in the real world, then its idiotic to take pleasure in it. Animations are not real. Humans are real. Therefore, it makes sense for you to take pleasure in pictures of actual human beings rather than some animated girl that would probably never exist in human form.

 

It's preposterous. Its egregious. Its outrageous!

 

EDIT:

 

Dead or Alive anyone?

Are you seriously going to write off everything good about Dead or Alive and say its just about the bouncing tits? Ever played it?

I never said that. I actually have played the game extensively and enjoyed it because of its game play. Not only that, the character art was excellent, and so were the backgrounds. However, I thought the bouncing tits were distracting to the game and was not necessary. IMO, it was there for marketing purposes because sex (animated or not) sells. My problem is the people who actually get excited looking at the animated stuff.

[L.S.D]

Uhh, really, i hardly notice the bouncing boobs in Dead Or Alive. Not when someone is bearing down on you. You must be a perv, GC

[BlackKnight]

Here's my philosophy ... if you can't find it in the real world, then its idiotic to take pleasure in it. Animations are not real. Humans are real. Therefore, it makes sense for you to take pleasure in pictures of actual human beings rather than some animated girl that would probably never exist in human form.

That is downright preposterous.

 

Humans need fantasy- the unreal. Without it you don't have drama, stories, movies... you are left with nothing but cold hard existential realities. Are you suggesting that humans need something to be 'real' to engage with it emotionally? If nothing else, The Matrix has taught us that's not the case. And why? Because fantasy is inherently more appealing than reality- it is fashioned from human imagination for precisely the purpose of being so.

 

You can take me literally, and say that movies have real actors. But have you never cried during Finding Nemo? Never gasped at a CGI monster? Never got emotionally caught up in a cartoon? Not even as a kid?

 

Either way, you have just undermined thousands of years of mythology, literature and critical theory. In short, to link reality and pleasure is preposterous, and we aren't even getting into the metaphysics or synaesthetics of pleasure yet.

 

I don't like hentai- hell I don't even like watching anime. But to say you honestly 'don't get' the appeal is incredibly narrow-minded, and just a little self-righteous.

 

 

Now onto the topic of Japanese sex dolls. Anyone seen Lars and The Real Girl?

[Alpha]

Uhh, really, i hardly notice the bouncing boobs in Dead Or Alive. Not when someone is bearing down on you. You must be a perv, GC

Good catch. I had a feeling someone would mention that. I just recently purchased a PS2 and that was one of the first games I ever noticed that went ahead and added gravity to women's breasts.

 

Perhaps you my friend are too used to looking at stuff like it and did not really notice it.

[Inky]

i find it pretty dorky and sad for grown ass men to find anime and video game girls hot. but the worst thing is hentai often involves degrading and abusing women, incest, tentacles, huge monster wangs and tits, feces, ect.

[Alpha]

Here's my philosophy ... if you can't find it in the real world, then its idiotic to take pleasure in it. Animations are not real. Humans are real. Therefore, it makes sense for you to take pleasure in pictures of actual human beings rather than some animated girl that would probably never exist in human form.

That is downright preposterous.

 

Humans need fantasy- the unreal. Without it you don't have drama, stories, movies... you are left with nothing but cold hard existential realities. Are you suggesting that humans need something to be 'real' to engage with it emotionally? If nothing else, The Matrix has taught us that's not the case.

 

You can take me literally, and say that movies have real actors. But have you never cried during Finding Nemo? Never gasped at a CGI monster? Never got emotionally caught up in a cartoon? Not even as a kid?

 

Either way, you have just undermined thousands of years of mythology, literature and critical theory. In short, to link reality and pleasure is preposterous, and we aren't even getting into the metaphysics or synaesthetics of pleasure yet.

Finding Nemo? No, I did not cry watching that movie. Nor have I ever cried watching Toy Story, Jungle Book, The Beauty and the Beast, etc. ... wait most of those are probably not CGI ... but no, I have never cried watching any CGI film either.

 

Sure, fantasizing is what makes the world go around (or round?). But I am not just talking about fantasizing. I'm talking about pleasuring yourself through fantasizing animations. Why fantasize on animated women? Can you have sex with an animated woman? Does it make any damn sense? That's what my primary argument is about. Yes, you can generalize and say my argument breaks instantaneously because turning imagination into reality is how the human civilization has been so successful. BUT, you can't turn an animated woman into a human woman. Sorry, it doesn't work.

 

i find it pretty dorky and sad for grown ass men to find anime and video game girls hot. but the worst thing is hentai often involves degrading and abusing women, incest, tentacles, huge monster wangs and tits, feces, ect.

Wow. I honestly did not know that. In fact, that disturbs me even more.

[BlackKnight]

BUT, you can't turn an animated woman into a human woman. Sorry, it doesn't work.

I'd hate to think what you'd say about homosexuals. I mean, they aren't even lusting over women at all- real or animated. If fapping over a cartoon chick is unnatural, how sick are they?

[Alpha]

BUT, you can't turn an animated woman into a human woman. Sorry, it doesn't work.

I'd hate to think what you'd say about homosexuals. I mean, they aren't even lusting over women at all- real or animated. If fapping over a cartoon chick is unnatural, how sick are they?

I have lost you. What does this have to do with homosexuals? Men are lusting for men (or women lusting for women), which are not animated. Homosexuals are an exception to the argument. Some agree that they are born with it and its a biological problem, others believe they acquire it over time. It's called the Nature vs. Nurture argument. For them, it's natural to have sex with the same sex. So therefore, they are not sick.

 

Now fapping over a cartoon chick, when you probably don't have a biological problem, or acquired problem --- then it IS sick in my opinion.

 

EDIT/ P.S. I'm not saying homosexuals are a problem or have a problem. I'm just saying that they have different or acquire different sexual characteristics that makes them attracted to his or her same sex.

[BlackKnight]

I have lost you. What does this have to do with homosexuals? Men are lusting for men (or women lusting for women), which are not animated. Homosexuals are an exception to the argument. Some agree that they are born with it and its a biological problem, others believe they acquire it over time. It's called the Nature vs. Nurture argument. For them, it's natural to have sex with the same sex. So therefore, they are not sick.

 

Now fapping over a cartoon chick, when you probably don't have a biological problem, or acquired problem --- then it IS sick in my opinion.

So what if it seems natural to the sick person doing it? Sick people aren't thinking straight. After all, thinking that having sex with the same sex is 'natural', given nature's purpose for sexual dimorphism in the first place, is the stupidest thing I've heard in my short life.

 

Basically, why do you think it is OK to consider fantasising over a stylised woman 'sick', and yet to consider shoving a dick up someone's arse perfectly fine?

 

Both are things that people do consciously, knowingly. Neither are 'normal' and both equally unnatural. Yet you are condemning one, but quickly making excuses for the other. That's what I don't get.

[Alpha]

I have lost you. What does this have to do with homosexuals? Men are lusting for men (or women lusting for women), which are not animated. Homosexuals are an exception to the argument. Some agree that they are born with it and its a biological problem, others believe they acquire it over time. It's called the Nature vs. Nurture argument. For them, it's natural to have sex with the same sex. So therefore, they are not sick.

 

Now fapping over a cartoon chick, when you probably don't have a biological problem, or acquired problem --- then it IS sick in my opinion.

But what if it seems natural to the person doing it? And what does it being a biological or acquired problem have to do with it? A problem's a problem, right? They are both conscious permissions of the will, aren't they?

 

Basically, why do you think it is OK to consider the hentai crowd 'sick', and yet to consider shoving a dick up someone's arse perfectly fine?

 

They're both perversions of the 'normal'. Both are 'sick' things that people give into consciously, knowingly. Yet you are condemning one, but quickly making excuses for the other. That's what I don't get.

First, please read my edit in my last post.

 

Secondly, I may have to retract from my argument and say that it may indeed be okay for people to be aroused by animated people. However, I do not think its okay or sensible for humans to purposely pleasure themselves from animated people. If that person finds its natural to do that, then perhaps he or she also has an altered biological or acquired trait?

 

The nature vs. nurture argument has everything to do with it. Perhaps you're not willing to accept that homosexuals may indeed have a biological difference.

 

Think of it this way -- does it not make sense for me to say its okay for a man who has Schizophrenia to see dead people when they are really not there? Yes, it's okay, because that's the symptom of Schizophrenia. The person maybe has a biological problem or too much norepinephrine.