Kof 2k MANIAC STRIKERS

[montpics]

The ANother Striker is the stupidest thing I have ever seen from SNK.

They shouldn't put characters that are not coherent to the storyline.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It did, in some occasions of HK comics.

[Sybarite Paladin AxL]

mads I deserve credit for this topic (I'm acting bitchy atm, sry)

 

LSD I would think you smarter than that, these are just strikers dude, if you really think about it none of the another strikers or maniac strikers are in any way coherent, but they are just for fillup... like Mortal Kombat Puzzle of for MKD and such, I wouldn't have liked KoF 2k that much if it didn't have these kinda strikers anyway....

and the ps2 version has the following: [HEAVY D!] [LUCKY GLAUBER] [bRIAN BATTLER] [OROCHI LEONA] [OROCHI IORI] [WOLFGANG KRAUSER] [Mr. BIG] [HIDERN] [OROCHI] [KRIZALID].....

 

secondly it was thought that G-mantle was from Kizuna Encounter rather then AoF according to some faqs, seeing as there is an unreleased proto called Kizuna Encounter Special or something like that...

Edited January 22, 2005 by axl

[Madi]

suck it up axl

[L.S.D]

LSD I would think you smarter than that, these are just strikers dude, if you really think about it none of the another strikers or maniac strikers are in any way coherent, but they are just for fillup... like Mortal Kombat Puzzle of for MKD and such, I wouldn't have liked KoF 2k that much if it didn't have these kinda strikers anyway....

 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

heh, call me fanboy, but I would prefer if they stick to the story with characters from the story, just like KOF99.

So what if we have less strikers to use? Not that all the strikers available are very useful in the 1st place

[Dooz]

I think the strikers were awesome. So what if it doesn't apply to the story, I think it makes the game that much more fun.

[montpics]

Yeah, think about how to use them to make multiple combos on your opponent.