Jump to content

mike260

Members+
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mike260

  1. So, I don't think it's unreasonable to say that the entire package should use around 96k of ram under normal conditions.  This can be tweaked and tuned, and I'll probably drop the amount of memory a while after the first revision has been out for a while. (when I get a chance to play around with some apps and figure out just how much is actually being used.)

     

    Cool, that sounds pretty reasonable. Re. dynamic memory though, is there any chance you could support user-supplied malloc/free functions?

     

    Can't wait for the lib, best of luck getting it wrapped up and collecting the rest of that well-deserved bounty.

×
×
  • Create New...