Gryph Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krosigrim Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 SH|T!!!! EM said Stallone said this movie is quite violent, more so than regular. No joke.... after seeing that... I gotta go see it. How old is he now? 60+ It does look entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted January 20, 2008 Author Share Posted January 20, 2008 I think he is 61. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucandrake Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 Dude that movie already has more blood then most action movies I've seen lol, I need to watch this!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cody56 Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 Ok I've only seen commercials for this movie. Anybody else think it looks like it's directed by the same people as "The Condemned"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted January 20, 2008 Author Share Posted January 20, 2008 It's directed by Sylvester Stallone. The Condemned was garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted January 20, 2008 Author Share Posted January 20, 2008 Dude that movie already has more blood then most action movies I've seen lol, I need to watch this!!In an interview he said he made sure it was the most violent movie. It was originally rated NC-17 but he convinced the MPAA to give it R. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cody56 Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 It's directed by Sylvester Stallone. The Condemned was garbage. Dude, The Condemned was an awesome movie in my opinion. ;P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devia Eleven Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 I still question the naming of the new Sylvester titles, why don't they keep the number instead of just renaming the sequel with just the main title, it completely ruins everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gryph Posted January 21, 2008 Author Share Posted January 21, 2008 I still question the naming of the new Sylvester titles, why don't they keep the number instead of just renaming the sequel with just the main title, it completely ruins everything.No it doesn't. The naming scheme makes perfect sense since he is brining back these dormant characters after such a long time and these movies are all about the character. It's not important that it is the 4th movie in the series. All that matters is that is Rambo. Do you know anything about branding? Edit: Also, how does it completely ruin everything? Please explain this statement. Is this movie going to suck because it doesn't have 4 at the end of the title? I don't understand this exaggeration. I think it's a stupid thing to think it ruins everything because of something this trivial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devia Eleven Posted January 21, 2008 Share Posted January 21, 2008 So this movie isn't a sequel? I was aimlessly assuming that this movie was a direct sequel to the previous Rambo movie that was released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now